|
What Is a Part 150 Study?
How long will the FAA take to review the report?
When will the plan be implemented?
How many flights will the Fed Ex hub add?
What is a head-to-head operation?
What options exist to minimize noise in addition
to head-to-head night operations?
How is the community involved in the Part 150
process?
What is the role of the advisory committees? What
is the extent of their authority?
How will the Citizens Committee work with the two
other committees?
Are there other Part 150 studies that have been
particularly successful or effective that the local
committees should look at and attempt to emulate?
Can one group lobby through the Part 150 process
to have a specific change made to the plan?
Can the work of the Part 150 committees stop the
FedEx project?
Where are the committees arriving in the process?
What decisions have already been made? What are the
limits of discussion?
What will the committees do to ensure that safety
isn’t compromised?
Is it within the power of the committee to extend
the buyout area?
What are the potential noise mitigation costs and
who will bear the burden of those costs?
If my property is eligible for buyout or noise
insulation, how quickly do I have to decide what to do?
What Is a Part 150 Study?
A “FAR Part 150 Study” is an in-depth process that
involves developing a detailed analysis of airport noise
levels and variables, working with the community to
address its concerns, and creating a plan to reduce the
impact of aircraft noise. It is called a FAR Part 150
Study because it is a noise and land use compatibility
study that is conducted under Federal Aviation
Regulation Part 150. The Piedmont Triad International
Airport study will entail approximately two years of
analysis before a detailed report is submitted to the
Federal Aviation Administration.
How long will the FAA take to review the report?
The FAA conducts an evaluation of each Noise
Compatibility Program (NCP) and, based on that
evaluation, either approves or disapproves the program,
or portions of it. The FAA conducts its review within
180-days of formal receipt of the required documents (as
posted in the Federal Register).
The FAA may exceed the 180-day review timeframe
regarding portions of the NCP that relate to the use of
flight procedures for noise compatibility purposes. The
FAA regulation states that in this case, approval or
disapproval “will be issued within a reasonable time
after receipt of the program.”
When will the plan be implemented?
Once the FAA reviews the Noise Exposure Map (NEM) and
accepts the noise contours, reviews the NCP and approves
it, then the NCP may be implemented. The FAA approval of
the NCP may contain conditions that must be satisfied
prior to implementation of portions of the NCP.
Otherwise, the airport can proceed with approved
components of the plan. Thus, we expect that
implementation would begin approximately two years after
completion of the study.
How many flights will the Fed Ex hub add?
When the FedEx hub opens, 26 FedEx flights (a
“flight” is considered a landing and a take-off) each
day are planned in the Triad. These 26 flights include
eight to nine flights a day already operating out of
Piedmont Triad International Airport. At full capacity,
FedEx is expected to operate 63 flights per day, five
days a week.
What is a head-to-head operation?
Head-to-head operations allow arrivals and departures
to take place over the same runway end, which reduces
aircraft taxi time and minimizes aircraft noise at the
highest levels over the most densely populated areas.
Plans by FedEx to run head-to-head operations were
evaluated in the FAA’s Environmental Impact Statement.
The procedure will consist of arrivals to the northeast
on runways 5L and 5R and departures to the southwest on
runways 23L and 23R. While there will be simultaneous
operations on the parallel runways, all operations
during a given period of head-to-head activity will be
either arrivals or departures.
What options exist to minimize noise in addition
to head-to-head night operations?
FAR Part 150 mandates consideration of a full range
of measures:
- Acquisition of land and interests therein,
including, but not limited to air rights, easements,
and development rights, to ensure the use of
property for purposes which are compatible with
airport operations.
- Construction of barriers and acoustical
shielding, including the soundproofing of public
buildings.
- Implementation of a preferential runway system.
- Use of flight procedures (including the
modifications of flight tracks) to control the
operation of aircraft to reduce exposure of
individuals (or specific noise sensitive areas) to
noise in the area around the airport.
- Implementation of any restriction on the use of
airport by any type or class of aircraft based on
the noise characteristics of those aircraft. Such
restrictions may include, but are not limited to –
- Denial of use of the airport to aircraft
types or classes which do not meet Federal noise
standards;
- Capacity limitations based on the relative
noisiness of different types of aircraft;
- Requirement that aircraft using the airport
must use noise abatement takeoff or approach
procedures previously approved as safe by the
FAA;
- Landing fees based on FAA certificated or
estimated noise emission levels or on time of
arrival; and
- Partial or complete curfews.
- Other actions or combinations of actions which
would have a beneficial noise control or abatement
impact on the public.
- Other actions recommended for analysis by the
FAA for the specific airport.
FAR Part 150 recognizes that some measures may be
inappropriate for a specific airport. Further, as noted
earlier, analysis under FAR Part 161 is required before
an airport may implement a noise-related restriction on
use of the airport.
How is the community involved in the Part 150
process?
Three local committees have been formed to consider
the noise impact of the expansion of the Piedmont Triad
International Airport: the Citizens Advisory Committee,
the Airport Users Advisory Committee, and the Government
Advisory Committee. As one aspect of the FAR Part 150
Study, the committees provide the perspective of
residents, airlines and other airport users, and local
government to the airport noise analyses and resulting
noise compatibility program.
What is the role of the advisory committees? What
is the extent of their authority?
The committees’ role is one of advisor to the
consultants responsible for developing the PTIA Noise
Compatibility Program. Committee members are asked to
provide input about the interests and concerns of their
neighborhoods. They are asked to review and comment on
all aspects of the study, such as analyses of noise
exposure, noise impacts and potential noise abatement
measures. The committee is able to propose noise
abatement measures and suggest refinements to measures
proposed by other participants in the study. Finally,
the committee will be asked to review and critique the
proposed and recommended Noise Compatibility Program.
How will the Citizens Committee work with the two
other committees?
The consultant conducting the FAR Part 150 Study,
Andrew S. Harris Inc., is responsible for drawing upon
the input from all three committees. However, all the
committee meetings are open, so members of each
Committee are free to sit in on the other committee
meetings. Individual committees may choose at the
committee’s discretion to assign a particular member to
monitor the meetings of the other two committees.
Are there other Part 150 studies that have been
particularly successful or effective that the local
committees should look at and attempt to emulate?
While many of the elements of a Part 150 Study are
the same, every airport and every community is
different. As a result, the needs, the process and the
outcomes of the Part 150 Study are unique to each
airport region. The most successful studies are those
with a successful process.
Can one group lobby through the Part 150 process
to have a specific change made to the plan?
The Part 150 Study will develop mitigation measures
so that aircraft noise affects the fewest people. A
change in procedures will not be made so that a greater
number of people in a different area are negatively
affected for the benefit of a smaller group. In other
words, it is not possible for a small, vocal group to
override the interests of a larger, less-vocal group.
Openness assures that one group will not have advantage
over another.
Can the work of the Part 150 committees stop the
FedEx project?
No. The mission of the committees is to examine how
noise may be reduced once the airport expansion and
FedEx projects are complete and the hub and runway are
operational. In fact, if the airport expansion and FedEx
projects were not to go forward for some reason, much of
the work of the Part 150 committees would no longer be
necessary.
Where are the committees arriving in the process?
What decisions have already been made? What are the
limits of discussion?
The committees have begun their work with several
decisions set. They are:
- The new runway and the FedEx hub are being built
and are expected to open in 2009.
- The design of the new runway, FedEx hub and
related construction are established.
- Most flights landing and departing on the new
runway (about 95 percent) will take place over the
area southwest of the PTIA.
In addition, federal regulations or policies have
determined other parameters, including:
- Approved methods to measure and assess noise.
- Exposure of 70 DNL and higher is not generally
compatible with residential use and homes in such
areas are eligible for mitigation measures such as
buyout.
- Exposure of 65 DNL and lower is compatible with
residential living.
- Homeowners within the DNL 65 contour may be
offered mitigation measures such as soundproofing to
minimize any impacts from aircraft noise.
The committees’ work is as advisors to the Part 150
process.
What will the committees do to ensure that safety
isn’t compromised?
Safety is always the overriding concern. The FAA will
not approve measures that are unsafe.
Is it within the power of the committee to extend
the buyout area?
No, FAA policy and federal law establish the use of
funds for measures such as buyout.
What are the potential noise mitigation costs and
who will bear the burden of those costs?
The FEIS included cost estimates for buyouts and
sound insulation at $10.8 million. During the Part 150
Study we will update the cost estimates. The costs will
be paid primarily with federal funds.
If my property is eligible for buyout or noise
insulation, how quickly do I have to decide what to do?
When the Noise Compatibility Plan is completed,
homeowners will have the chance to learn about the
results and adequate time to consider their options.
Some Part 150 studies have essentially “open-ended”
enrollment for sound insulation; home owners may accept
sound insulation in those programs as long as funding is
available.
|