PTI Part 150 update

Welcome
What's New
Part 150
Aircraft Noise
Public Involvement
Newsletters
Maps
Archives
FAQ
Documents
Glossary Page
Feedback
Search

 

 

FAQ  

What Is a Part 150 Study?

How long will the FAA take to review the report?

When will the plan be implemented?

How many flights will the Fed Ex hub add?

What is a head-to-head operation?

What options exist to minimize noise in addition to head-to-head night operations?

How is the community involved in the Part 150 process?

What is the role of the advisory committees? What is the extent of their authority?

How will the Citizens Committee work with the two other committees?

Are there other Part 150 studies that have been particularly successful or effective that the local committees should look at and attempt to emulate?

Can one group lobby through the Part 150 process to have a specific change made to the plan?

Can the work of the Part 150 committees stop the FedEx project?

Where are the committees arriving in the process? What decisions have already been made? What are the limits of discussion?

What will the committees do to ensure that safety isn’t compromised?

Is it within the power of the committee to extend the buyout area?

What are the potential noise mitigation costs and who will bear the burden of those costs?

If my property is eligible for buyout or noise insulation, how quickly do I have to decide what to do?

 

What Is a Part 150 Study?

 

TOP

A “FAR Part 150 Study” is an in-depth process that involves developing a detailed analysis of airport noise levels and variables, working with the community to address its concerns, and creating a plan to reduce the impact of aircraft noise. It is called a FAR Part 150 Study because it is a noise and land use compatibility study that is conducted under Federal Aviation Regulation Part 150. The Piedmont Triad International Airport study will entail approximately two years of analysis before a detailed report is submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration.

 

How long will the FAA take to review the report?

 

TOP

The FAA conducts an evaluation of each Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) and, based on that evaluation, either approves or disapproves the program, or portions of it. The FAA conducts its review within 180-days of formal receipt of the required documents (as posted in the Federal Register).

The FAA may exceed the 180-day review timeframe regarding portions of the NCP that relate to the use of flight procedures for noise compatibility purposes. The FAA regulation states that in this case, approval or disapproval “will be issued within a reasonable time after receipt of the program.”

 

When will the plan be implemented?

 

TOP

Once the FAA reviews the Noise Exposure Map (NEM) and accepts the noise contours, reviews the NCP and approves it, then the NCP may be implemented. The FAA approval of the NCP may contain conditions that must be satisfied prior to implementation of portions of the NCP. Otherwise, the airport can proceed with approved components of the plan. Thus, we expect that implementation would begin approximately two years after completion of the study.

 

How many flights will the Fed Ex hub add?

 

TOP

When the FedEx hub opens, 26 FedEx flights (a “flight” is considered a landing and a take-off) each day are planned in the Triad. These 26 flights include eight to nine flights a day already operating out of Piedmont Triad International Airport. At full capacity, FedEx is expected to operate 63 flights per day, five days a week.

 

What is a head-to-head operation?

 

TOP

Head-to-head operations allow arrivals and departures to take place over the same runway end, which reduces aircraft taxi time and minimizes aircraft noise at the highest levels over the most densely populated areas. Plans by FedEx to run head-to-head operations were evaluated in the FAA’s Environmental Impact Statement. The procedure will consist of arrivals to the northeast on runways 5L and 5R and departures to the southwest on runways 23L and 23R. While there will be simultaneous operations on the parallel runways, all operations during a given period of head-to-head activity will be either arrivals or departures.

 

What options exist to minimize noise in addition to head-to-head night operations?

 

TOP

FAR Part 150 mandates consideration of a full range of measures:

  • Acquisition of land and interests therein, including, but not limited to air rights, easements, and development rights, to ensure the use of property for purposes which are compatible with airport operations.
  • Construction of barriers and acoustical shielding, including the soundproofing of public buildings.
  • Implementation of a preferential runway system.
  • Use of flight procedures (including the modifications of flight tracks) to control the operation of aircraft to reduce exposure of individuals (or specific noise sensitive areas) to noise in the area around the airport.
  • Implementation of any restriction on the use of airport by any type or class of aircraft based on the noise characteristics of those aircraft. Such restrictions may include, but are not limited to –
    • Denial of use of the airport to aircraft types or classes which do not meet Federal noise standards;
    • Capacity limitations based on the relative noisiness of different types of aircraft;
    • Requirement that aircraft using the airport must use noise abatement takeoff or approach procedures previously approved as safe by the FAA;
    • Landing fees based on FAA certificated or estimated noise emission levels or on time of arrival; and
    • Partial or complete curfews.
  • Other actions or combinations of actions which would have a beneficial noise control or abatement impact on the public.
  • Other actions recommended for analysis by the FAA for the specific airport.

FAR Part 150 recognizes that some measures may be inappropriate for a specific airport. Further, as noted earlier, analysis under FAR Part 161 is required before an airport may implement a noise-related restriction on use of the airport.

 

How is the community involved in the Part 150 process?

 

TOP

Three local committees have been formed to consider the noise impact of the expansion of the Piedmont Triad International Airport: the Citizens Advisory Committee, the Airport Users Advisory Committee, and the Government Advisory Committee. As one aspect of the FAR Part 150 Study, the committees provide the perspective of residents, airlines and other airport users, and local government to the airport noise analyses and resulting noise compatibility program.

 

What is the role of the advisory committees? What is the extent of their authority?

 

TOP

The committees’ role is one of advisor to the consultants responsible for developing the PTIA Noise Compatibility Program. Committee members are asked to provide input about the interests and concerns of their neighborhoods. They are asked to review and comment on all aspects of the study, such as analyses of noise exposure, noise impacts and potential noise abatement measures. The committee is able to propose noise abatement measures and suggest refinements to measures proposed by other participants in the study. Finally, the committee will be asked to review and critique the proposed and recommended Noise Compatibility Program.

 

How will the Citizens Committee work with the two other committees?

 

TOP

The consultant conducting the FAR Part 150 Study, Andrew S. Harris Inc., is responsible for drawing upon the input from all three committees. However, all the committee meetings are open, so members of each Committee are free to sit in on the other committee meetings. Individual committees may choose at the committee’s discretion to assign a particular member to monitor the meetings of the other two committees.

 

Are there other Part 150 studies that have been particularly successful or effective that the local committees should look at and attempt to emulate?

 

TOP

While many of the elements of a Part 150 Study are the same, every airport and every community is different. As a result, the needs, the process and the outcomes of the Part 150 Study are unique to each airport region. The most successful studies are those with a successful process.

 

Can one group lobby through the Part 150 process to have a specific change made to the plan?

 

TOP

The Part 150 Study will develop mitigation measures so that aircraft noise affects the fewest people. A change in procedures will not be made so that a greater number of people in a different area are negatively affected for the benefit of a smaller group. In other words, it is not possible for a small, vocal group to override the interests of a larger, less-vocal group. Openness assures that one group will not have advantage over another.

 

Can the work of the Part 150 committees stop the FedEx project?

 

TOP

No. The mission of the committees is to examine how noise may be reduced once the airport expansion and FedEx projects are complete and the hub and runway are operational. In fact, if the airport expansion and FedEx projects were not to go forward for some reason, much of the work of the Part 150 committees would no longer be necessary.

 

Where are the committees arriving in the process? What decisions have already been made? What are the limits of discussion?

 

TOP

The committees have begun their work with several decisions set. They are:

  • The new runway and the FedEx hub are being built and are expected to open in 2009.
  • The design of the new runway, FedEx hub and related construction are established.
  • Most flights landing and departing on the new runway (about 95 percent) will take place over the area southwest of the PTIA.

In addition, federal regulations or policies have determined other parameters, including:

  • Approved methods to measure and assess noise.
  • Exposure of 70 DNL and higher is not generally compatible with residential use and homes in such areas are eligible for mitigation measures such as buyout.
  • Exposure of 65 DNL and lower is compatible with residential living.
  • Homeowners within the DNL 65 contour may be offered mitigation measures such as soundproofing to minimize any impacts from aircraft noise.

The committees’ work is as advisors to the Part 150 process.

 

What will the committees do to ensure that safety isn’t compromised?

 

TOP

Safety is always the overriding concern. The FAA will not approve measures that are unsafe.

 

Is it within the power of the committee to extend the buyout area?

 

TOP

No, FAA policy and federal law establish the use of funds for measures such as buyout.

 

What are the potential noise mitigation costs and who will bear the burden of those costs?

 

TOP

The FEIS included cost estimates for buyouts and sound insulation at $10.8 million. During the Part 150 Study we will update the cost estimates. The costs will be paid primarily with federal funds.

 

If my property is eligible for buyout or noise insulation, how quickly do I have to decide what to do?

 

TOP

When the Noise Compatibility Plan is completed, homeowners will have the chance to learn about the results and adequate time to consider their options. Some Part 150 studies have essentially “open-ended” enrollment for sound insulation; home owners may accept sound insulation in those programs as long as funding is available.

 

Welcome • Contact Us • Links • Terms of Use